Skip to main content
Advocacy training for the Bar

Practise the cross-examination
you can't rehearse alone.

Silk puts you against a realistic AI witness or client under real time pressure, then scores the session against the BSB Curriculum and Assessment Strategy - the same criteria you'll be assessed on. Book a scenario, run the session, get a structured debrief in minutes.

3
Advocacy formats trained against BSB-aligned criteria - Cross-Examination, Conference Skills, and Examination-in-Chief
12
Scenarios live today, spanning criminal and civil-adjacent fact patterns
5
Weighted competency dimensions scored on every session, mapped to the published BSB assessment criteria
Dec 2023
BSB Curriculum and Assessment Strategy - the published standard every Silk debrief is scored against
The problem

Most advocacy preparation happens alone, with nothing that argues back

Most preparation before a BSB assessment happens in front of a mirror or a patient friend reading from a script. It is useful for pacing and structure, but it cannot do the one thing that actually determines whether an examination holds up under pressure: push back. A friend reading a witness statement will not contradict you, will not notice when you fail to put the case on a material point, and will not remember what you said three questions ago and use it against you.

"A person is entitled to have his case put to the witnesses on the other side... it is a rule of essential justice that the witness be given an opportunity to deal with it."

Browne v Dunn (1893) - the professional duty behind every Silk Fatal Flaw check
Session length by format
15 min
Cross-Examination - questioning technique, credibility challenge, and structure under a fixed clock, matching the real assessment's pace.
15 min
Examination-in-Chief - open, non-leading questioning that draws out your own witness's account without prompting.
25 min
Conference Skills - a full advice conference with a lay client, weighing options and giving clear, professionally sound guidance.
Every format runs to the same time limit you'll face in a real BSB assessment - the session ends when the clock does, not when you're ready.

A friend reading a script is not a witness

Real witnesses and lay clients are evasive, inconsistent, and sometimes convincing in the moment. A rehearsed run-through with a friend cannot replicate the pressure of a witness who contradicts their own earlier account, or a client whose story shifts as you question them.

Missed material points go unnoticed

Failing to put a material element of your case to a witness is both a technique failure and a professional conduct failure. Solo practice has no mechanism to catch it - you only find out you missed it when an examiner marks you down for it.

Performance goes unmeasured

A mirror cannot tell you that your structure held for the first six questions and fell apart under the seventh, or which of the five BSB competency dimensions actually needs work. That level of precision requires a different approach.

Mock advocacy days are rare and costly

Real mock advocacy days with trained actors exist, but they are expensive, infrequent, and oversubscribed relative to the number of students who need them before every sitting. Most candidates get one or two before an assessment - if they can get a place at all.

What Silk is

A practice and assessment environment for oral advocacy

You choose a scenario and a format - Cross-Examination, Conference Skills, or Examination-in-Chief - and face a realistic AI witness or client who responds in character, under time pressure, exactly as a real witness or lay client would. Every session is scored against the BSB Curriculum and Assessment Strategy's published weighted competencies for that format, with an automatic Fatal Flaw check for the conduct failures that fail a session outright regardless of score.

What makes it different

Silk's witnesses and clients are not reading from a fixed script. They hold a consistent account, respond to how you question them, and can be pushed - or can catch you out - exactly as a real witness would. When you fail to put a material point, the Fatal Flaw check notices, exactly as a real examiner would.

  • Three BSB-aligned formats - Cross-Examination, Conference Skills, Examination-in-Chief
  • Realistic AI witness or client, responsive to your own line of questioning
  • Fixed session clock matching the real BSB assessment time limit for each format
  • Fatal Flaw check running throughout - an automatic-fail layer separate from your numeric score
  • Optional live coaching in practice mode - switched off entirely in assessment mode
  • Structured debrief on completion - grade, dimension breakdown, and full transcript, emailed with a PDF record

Choose a format and scenario

Book a session at app.inquera.ai/silk/buy - pick Cross-Examination, Conference Skills, or Examination-in-Chief, then a fact pattern. Choose practice mode for live coaching, or assessment mode to match the real exam standard.

Read your brief

Before the session begins, you receive the case papers and brief for the scenario - the facts, the instructions, and what you need to establish. This is the only information you hold when the session starts.

Run the session

You question, examine, or advise against a realistic AI witness or client for the full format duration. The Fatal Flaw check runs throughout - if you fail to put a material point, or commit another conduct failure, the session can fail outright regardless of your numeric score.

Get your debrief

Within minutes, you receive a structured debrief: overall grade, a breakdown across the format's five weighted BSB dimensions, the full transcript, and qualitative feedback on what worked and what to change - emailed with a PDF record you can keep.

The formats

Three formats. The same BSB criteria you'll be assessed on.

Each format is scored against its own published BSB weighted dimensions - not a proprietary rubric you have to translate against what you'll actually face.

Cross-Examination

R v Whitfield

Fraud trial - fictional composite

You cross-examine the defendant on an inconsistent account of a disputed transaction. A Fatal Flaw check runs throughout the session - failing to put a material element of your case on the record ends the session regardless of your numeric score.

Questioning Technique 30% Undermining Credibility 20% Putting the Case 20%
Conference Skills

Advice conference - GBH, self-defence plea

25-minute format - fictional composite

You advise a lay client weighing a self-defence plea, scored on the format's own weighted criteria for client-facing communication, case analysis, and professional judgement - the longest of the three formats, reflecting a real conference's pace.

Advice 30% Interaction & Communication 20% Structure 20%
Examination-in-Chief

Eyewitness identification

Misidentification case - fictional composite

You examine your own witness through a disputed identification account, scored against the format's own weighted criteria for structure, open questioning, and narrative control - without leading your own witness.

Content 40% Questioning Technique 30% Structure 10%
The output

The Silk debrief

Every completed Silk session generates a structured debrief - your overall grade and score, a breakdown across the format's five weighted BSB dimensions, the Fatal Flaw check result, the full transcript, and qualitative feedback on what worked and what to change. It's emailed to you with a PDF record you can keep.

The debrief is built for self-review before a resit or your next sitting - a precise account of where your technique held and where it needs work, cited to the moments in your own transcript, not a general impression.

Before an assessment or resit

Run the format you're weakest on the week before your sitting. The debrief shows exactly which BSB dimension needs the most work, cited to specific moments in your own transcript.

A record you can bring to a mentor

The PDF debrief is yours to keep - a precise, objective account you can bring to a supervisor, pupil supervisor, or mentor, if and when you choose to share it. Nothing is shared automatically.

Silk debrief - sample Fatal Flaw: passed
B 71 / 100 - Cross-Examination
Questioning Technique
74
Communication & Delivery
68
Undermining Credibility
61
Putting & Advancing the Case
82
Structure
70

"You told the officer at the scene you'd never seen the complainant before. But you'd give evidence today that you recognised him from the estate. Which is it, Mr Whitfield?"

Turn 14 - Undermining Credibility
Assessment engine: Strong structural control throughout. The credibility challenge at turn 14 was well-put but not followed up - a second-order use of the same inconsistency you can revisit before your next session.
Frameworks

Assessed against the standard you'll actually be examined on

Every Silk debrief dimension is mapped directly to published BSB standards. There is no proprietary rubric to translate against what you'll actually face.

BSB
Curriculum and Assessment Strategy, December 2023

Every Silk debrief is scored against the same weighted competency dimensions published in the BSB's own Curriculum and Assessment Strategy - the criteria that actually determine your assessment outcome, not a rubric we've written ourselves.

  • Questioning Technique and Content
  • Communication & Delivery
  • Undermining Credibility (Cross-Examination)
  • Putting & Advancing the Case
  • Structure
CD
BSB Handbook - Core Duties

Silk's Fatal Flaw mechanism reflects the same professional conduct failures the BSB treats as automatic-fail grounds in a real assessment - including the duty to put your case on a material issue (Browne v Dunn), distinct from your numeric score.

  • Duty to the court and administration of justice
  • Duty to act in the client's best interests
  • Duty to put the case on every material issue
  • Professional conduct, independent of numeric score
For the advocate

Silk takes exam-day pressure seriously

Preparing for a BSB assessment alone is isolating - there is no colleague to spot what you missed, no supervisor to catch a weak line of questioning before it costs you marks. Real mock advocacy days are rare and expensive relative to how many candidates need them before every sitting. Silk is not a replacement for a real mock, and it is not a guarantee of a pass. It is a private, available-when-you-need-it space to face something that argues back, as many times as you need to before the sitting that matters.

Practise privately

Run a session from anywhere, at any time - no booking a room, no waiting for a mock advocacy day with a place available. Practice mode gives you live coaching; assessment mode matches the real exam standard exactly.

Under real time pressure

Every format runs to the same clock you'll face in the real assessment. There is no pause button and no do-over mid-session - exactly the pressure that a mirror or a script-reading friend cannot replicate.

A precise record of where you stand

A completed session does not guarantee a pass. But it gives you something a mirror cannot: a dimension-by-dimension account, cited to your own transcript, of exactly what to work on before you sit the real thing.

Who Silk is for

Built for the individual practitioner

Silk is a pay-per-session, self-serve tool today - no subscription, no institutional sign-off, no chambers administration required to book your first session.

BPTC / pupillage student

"How do I get realistic cross-examination practice before my assessment?"

Book a Cross-Examination or Examination-in-Chief session against a realistic AI witness who responds to your own questioning, under the same time limit and BSB criteria you'll be assessed on. No script, no friend reading lines - a witness who can catch you out.

Junior tenant preparing a resit

"I need to prepare for a reassessment without booking a full mock advocacy day."

Run the format and scenario closest to your weak area as many times as you need, in assessment mode, and get a precise dimension-by-dimension debrief after each one. Pay only for the session you book - no waiting list, no minimum commitment.

Chambers & AETO training providers - coming soon

"Can we book this for a cohort of pupils or students?"

Silk today is built for the individual, self-funded practitioner. Cohort booking and chambers or AETO administration are on our roadmap, not available today - get in touch if this is what you need and we'll let you know when it's ready.

Book your first session

Choose a format and scenario, decide whether you want live coaching or a clean assessment run, and start. Pay only for the session you book - no subscription, no institutional sign-off required.